Alex Safian: The ‘Nakba’ narrative is nonsense 

Ten years later, despite much violence and conflict, Ben-Gurion’s core beliefs about living in peace with the Arabs had not wavered. In a speech on Dec. 13, 1947, he said: “In our state there will be non-Jews as well—and all of them will be equal citizens; equal in everything without exception … The attitude of the Jewish state to its Arab citizens will be an important factor—though not the only one—in building good neighborly relations with the Arab states.”

Despite the Jewish community’s attempts to live peacefully with their neighbors, the primary leader of the Palestinians, the grand mufti of Jerusalem, Haj Amin al-Husseini, chose to make common cause with the Nazis, declaring through his spokesman that the Arabs’ goal was “the elimination of the Jewish state.” (Larry Collins and Dominique Lapierre, “O Jerusalem,” 1st edition, p 400).

The mufti spent much of World War II in Nazi Germany, where he urged the accelerated extermination of the Jews in meetings with Hitler and Himmler, helped organize Bosnian Muslim SS units that committed grave war crimes against Serbian Christians and Jews and made numerous pro-Nazi propaganda broadcasts to the Arab world. For example, in a broadcast from Germany on March 1, 1944, Husseini urged Arabs everywhere to commit genocide against the Jews:

“Rise as one and fight for your sacred rights. Kill the Jews wherever you find them. This pleases God, history and religion. This serves your honor. God is with you.” (Jeffrey Herf, “Nazi Propaganda for the Arab World,” p. 213, Yale University Press, 2009.)

After the war Husseini was indicted by Yugoslavia for war crimes, but escaped prosecution by fleeing to Egypt, which gave him sanctuary. (For details on the Mufti’s life and activities see “The Mufti of Jerusalem Haj-Amin el-Husseini and National-Socialism,” by Jennie Lebel, Cigoya Stampa, 2007; “The Mufti and the Fuehrer,” Joseph Shechtman, Thomas Yoseloff Publisher, 1965.)

The mufti’s actions directly implicated the Palestinian movement in the Holocaust, but the Jews still tried to reach an accommodation with their Arab neighbors. When the United Nations in 1947 passed a resolution to partition the Palestine Mandate (or what was left of it, since most of the original territory had been lopped off by Britain to create the entirely Arab state of Trans-Jordan) into a Jewish and an Arab state, the Jews supported the plan, despite being deeply disappointed with how little land they would receive. The five Arab states in the United Nations all denounced the resolution (UNGA 181), voted against it, and together with the Palestinian representatives vowed to go to war to kill it.

Read full article here: https://www.jns.org/the-nakba-narrative-is-nonsense/

Benny Morris: Explaining Transfer – Zionistisches Denken und der Ursprung des palästinensischen Flüchtlingsproblems

“Das, was Husseini vor der Peel-Kommission diplomatisch implizierte, brachte er anderswo sehr viel expliziter zum Ausdruck: Juden und ihren Angehörigen, die nach 1917 ins Land gekommen waren, würde es nicht erlaubt sein, im Land zu bleiben. Dieser Ansicht war freilich nicht nur Husseini. Der Ruf nach »idbah al yahud« (»Schlachtet die Juden«) hatte alle Gewaltausbrüche und judenfeindlichen Pogrome, welche die Araber Palästinas 1920, 1921 und 1929 initiierten sowie wiederkehrend die Jahre der Revolte von 1936 bis 1939 begleitet. In Reaktion auf diese gewaltsame und auf Vertreibung abzielende Denkweise und Ideologie wandte sich die zionistische Führungsebene in zunehmendem Maße der Transfer-Idee als Lösung für das ›arabische Problem‹, mit dem sich der Jischuw konfrontiert sah, zu. Wenn dies der Feind war und dies seine Taten und Ziele, konnte sich kein lebensfähiger jüdischer Staat bilden mit einer großen arabischen Minderheit in seiner Mitte.”

Link zum vollständigen Artikel auf Mena-Watch: https://www.mena-watch.com/zionistisches-denken-und-bevoelkerungstransfer/

Die jüdische “Nakba” – Flucht und Vertreibung aus arabischen Ländern (Textreihe von Raimund Fastenbauer)

  1. https://www.mena-watch.com/die-juedische-nakba-wird-verschwiegen/
  2. https://www.mena-watch.com/die-vorgeschichte-der-juedischen-nakba/
  3. https://www.mena-watch.com/die-juedische-nakba-teil-3-die-vertreibung-aus-aegypten/
  4. https://www.mena-watch.com/die-juedische-nakba-teil-4-das-ende-der-juedischen-gemeinde-im-irak/
  5. https://www.mena-watch.com/juedische-nakba-teil-5-marokko/
  6. https://www.mena-watch.com/judische-nakba-teil-6-libanon-syrien/
  7. https://www.mena-watch.com/die-judische-nakba-teil-7-die-juden-des-jemen/
  8. https://www.mena-watch.com/die-judische-nakba-8-algerien-tunesien-libyen/
  9. https://www.mena-watch.com/die-juedische-nakba-teil-9-iran/
  10. https://www.mena-watch.com/etwa-eine-million-fluechtlinge-juedische-nakba/

Sol Stern: The Truth Behind the Palestinian “Catastrophe”

“The Israeli left’s version of the Nakba is all about one side, the Israeli side. Rarely discussed are the wartime deeds of the two most notorious Palestinian leaders, Haj Amin al-Husseini and Fawzi al-Qawuqji. Both were Nazi collaborators who spent World War II in Germany providing political and military services to the Hitler regime. In their 2010 book, Nazi Palestine: The Plans for the Extermination of the Jews, German historians Klaus-Michael Mallmann and Martin Kuppers documented that if the Nazis had prevailed at the battle of El Alamein and conquered Palestine, al-Husseini would have been flown home to supervise a Final Solution for the Jews of Palestine.

Al-Husseini was sought as a war criminal in Yugoslavia but escaped to Egypt in 1946 and was then elected chairman of the Arab Higher Committee, the political body representing the Palestinian Arabs during the postwar period. Al-Qawuqji was appointed by the Arab League to the position of field commander of the Arab Liberation Army, the Palestinian irregular military force that fought alongside the five invading Arab armies. In the event of an Arab victory in 1948, the two leaders planned to carry out a real Nakba for the Jews of Israel. Not just a wave of refugees, but mass murder.”

Read full article here.

Lyn Julius: Teaching the Holocaust in the Arab world has its pitfalls

It would raise uncomfortable questions about Arab collaboration with Nazism.

Full article here: https://www.jns.org/opinion/teaching-the-holocaust-in-the-arab-world-has-its-pitfalls/

Eine deutsche Übersetzung des Artikels ist auf MENA-Watch zu finden. Danke an die Übersetzer:

https://www.mena-watch.com/arabischer-holocaust-unterricht-mit-tuecken/?fbclid=IwAR1gJkznX2oRv697rKEpcFT4zuNU80392PkI3w4lbnq3efvF_oB5ezvyyKQ

Dem Vergessen entgegentreten: das Pogrom an den Juden im Irak am 01.06.-02.06.1941

“Das arabische Wort „Farhud“ bedeutet gewaltsame Enteignung. Es war ein Wort, das die Juden im Europa der Kriegszeit niemals kannten. Holocaust, wiederum, war ein Wort, das die Juden im Irak der Kriegsjahre nicht kannten. Aber bald würden sie alle die Bedeutung dieser Wörter verstehen, ungeachtet ihrer Sprache. Nach den Ereignissen vom 1. und 2. Juni fielen beide Wörter zusammen.”

Edwin Black

​”Am 1. Juni 2015 wurde auf einer Nebenveranstaltung bei den Vereinten Nationen der Internationale Farhud-Tag ausgerufen​. Er erinnert an einen großflächigen Pogrom (Farhud), der am 1. Juni 1941 von einem bewaffneten arabischen Mob an der jüdischen Gemeinschaft im Irak begangen wurde.”

Quellen:

https://www.gov.il/en/Departments/General/june-1-declared-international-farhud-day-jun-2015